|
Post by oldfotoman on Jan 17, 2013 20:59:47 GMT -5
I've posted another thread looking for more info on my newest model 24. Now I've got a few different questions concerning ammo for it.
According to Savage, it is a model 24F Predator in 223 over 20 gauge. My questions are specifically aimed at anyone with experience and use of ammo in a similar caliber or gauge from post 1995 manufacturing.
First, concerning the 20 gauge; is it safe to shoot slugs, and is is safe to shoot steel shot, as required in some areas for waterfowl. I'm not going to make a habit of either, but shoot enough to sight in and pattern it with either before actually going hunting with the same load.
Second, about the 223 barrel. I have shot many rounds of 5.56x45 NATO(M193 ball) ammo through my Savage 112 and my T/C Contender (both chambered for 223), with no adverse effects; but they are both bull or heavy barrels. Does anyone know if they would be okay in this too? Is the barrel to thin or are the lead tolerances too short, thus creating excessively high pressures. I know standard 5.56x45 M193 ammo averages about 62,000 psi and 223 about 56,000 when measured the same way, but the lead tolerances can make a big difference. Anyone ever use M193 5.56 ammo in theirs?
Please let me know if you have used any of these in either barrel, even if your gun is a different configuration. I would think the individual barrels made in the same time period should handle the same ammo loads.
Again, any and all info will be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by gastonguns on Jan 26, 2013 22:20:39 GMT -5
I only recently became a 24 F .223/12ga owner. I have not fired any 5.56 military ammo through mine. I don't know enough about the pressures involved with military ammo to want to risk using it. I use it in my Bushmasters, but not in guns chambered for .223 Remington.
That said, I tested some 55 grain .223 from Wolf and PMC, very cheap stuff that was given to me. Both were very unstable right out of the barrel. I loaded up some .223 based on 27 grains of Varget and 40 grain Nosler ballistic tips. It made a great group at about 35 yards with the flip sight. Next, a scope.
This evening I loaded some 55 gr Sierra BTHP with 27 gr of Varget (from the Speer loading book #14). We'll see how that works with the slow twist on he Model 24 rifle barrel. I hope it is better than the Wolf or PMC.
|
|
|
Post by oldfotoman on Jan 27, 2013 16:00:46 GMT -5
I have fired several boxes of PMC 55 grain soft points, and get 1 to 1.5 inch groups at 75 yards. I consider that acceptable for anything that was not designed for target shooting. Don't know why yours was unstable.
My info is that the model 24 has a 1:9 twist in the 223 barrels, which is what the original 223 ( and 5.56 NATO, M193, 55 grain) was designed for. For the military, it was then changed to 1:7 for the 62 grain M855 rounds. Some civilian makers also offered the faster 1:7 twist later, probably to be used with the commercial 69 grain ammo available. The difference between the 1:7 and The 1:9 shouldn't really be noticeable in barrels over 22 inches, except at long distance shooting. But it could be very noticeable in the 14 and 16 inch barrels used on some military style rifles. Most modern rounds develop their full potential both in both ballistics and accuracy in 20 - 22 inches.
My question about the 5.56 Nato M193 rounds was specifically asked due to the fact that I already have about 900 rounds that I bought dirt cheap. They shoot about 2 inches higher in my 112 at 75 yards than my 223 rounds do. But if the extra pressure would not be overly excessive in my model 24, I may like to use some of them in it also.
I'd still like to hear from anyone with info on the shotgun ammo also.
|
|
|
Post by bigkelly on Jan 28, 2013 16:48:05 GMT -5
I have shot just about every type of 20 ga ammo there is thru my 24V's with no problems except punkin balls.
|
|
|
Post by brawny on Jan 29, 2013 6:38:59 GMT -5
Howdy, Imho the issue with 5.56 vs 223 ammo is the lead (or throat)between the chamber and the lands is shorter in 223 than 5.56 military, military over all length is longer. What happens is the projectile is actually into the lands and causes a pressure spike. In acuracy loading it's common to have no more than 20 thousands gap but if its touching there is where the problem occurs. Cerro cast your chamber and find out the actuall dimensions. And then make an educated choice. Not all chambers are cut the same in the same run of guns from the same manufacturer. My point is do the reaserch save your gun and maybee your eyes/face! James
|
|
|
Post by oldfotoman on Feb 1, 2013 17:28:27 GMT -5
You are correct. I've done extensive research on the difference between the 5.65 and the 223.
The cartridges themselves are essentially identical, the difference being that the 5.56 Nato uses slightly thicker brass, so when using the same load, it produces about 5,000 psi more pressure than the 223. The lead on the NATO spec is .002" longer than for the SAMMI spec 223. So you are correct that when a 5.56 is placed in a 223 SAMMI spec barrel, it may cause even higher pressure.
The thing here is that most commercial barrels are not exact SAMMI or NATO spec like the test barrels that are used for the pressure testing. Most manufacturers of either the 5.56 or the 223 make their barrels slightly looser than spec because they know someone may fire these other rounds due to their lower costs. The exception is normally in their rifles designed specifically for high accuracy, such as their target or varmint rifles.
This was the reason for my initial posting asking if anyone had actual experience in their model 24. While I know that there is no certainty that all 24s are the same, I'm willing to make an educated guess on mine if I get a decent amount of response from people with actual experience.
I don't have the equipment to cast my own, or the reamer to cut it properly, and from what I have been able to determine; to purchase the good ones that I would want if I was going to do it myself would cost me about 75% of what the gun cost me, and a great deal more than Gun Parts listed replacement barrels for.
|
|
|
Post by cas on Feb 1, 2013 18:06:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by oldfotoman on Feb 2, 2013 13:09:12 GMT -5
Some very good articles, and some are ones that I read in doing my research on the differences between the cartridges.
From what I have been able to determine from all of the articles like this that I've read, the actual difference in pressure between the 2 cartridges is normally only about 2 - 5,000 psi when measured the same way and fired in the same gun with the longer leade. The problem may may occur and an extra 10 -15,000 psi may occur when the NATO is fired in a 223 barrel that is actually cut to the tight SAMMI specs. But most barrels aren't cut that tight.
Add to this the fact that most barrels are proof tested at or slightly above even this higher pressure, so obviously most barrels will handle an occasional 5.56 round through them. Certainly not meant to be a routine practice.
But from most everything I've read from all of these sources is that generally the difference in pressures found in actual shooting of these rounds is about an extra 4,000 psi when using the 5.56 NATO. Most of this testing was done and the results were given that when fired in the AR type rifles used for testing, generally the only real concern was that occasionally the higher pressures would cause a primer to pop out or a case swelling may cause some extraction trouble.
Obviously, these are not concerns for use in most bolt action or break open type rifles. I've fired several hundred rounds of 5.56 M193 ball ammo through my Savage 112 and through my T/C Contender with absolutely no ill effects, but these are bull (or heavy) barreled where I'm sure the extra thickness of these barrels will allow them to withstand much higher pressures than the thinner barrels used on the Model 24.
That was the reason I posted my original question asking if anyone had first hand knowledge of using any of these rounds in their guns. I've painted the bullet and front of the neck on several 5.56 cartridges and fully inserted them into my 24. When I pull them out, I can see marks in the paint lower on the neck, but none at all on the bullet, leading me to believe that this must have at least a slightly longer leade than the actual SAMMI specs. And you can usually feel quite a bit of difference in recoil if you have the tighter spec gun with the shorter leade. But even if it is labled as 223, when there isn't much difference at all in recoil, it's probably cut to a slightly longer leade more similar to the 5.56.
Since I have about 100 rounds of soft point 223, and about 900 rounds of M193 ball, it would just be nice to know before I attempt something that may be stupid.
And a note to "gastonguns", you may be right. While Savage told me and says in their booklets for their center fire guns that all 223 barrels have a 1:9 or a 1:7 twist, mine certainly doesn't look that fast either. I'll have to try to measure it and see. But I still get fairly tight groupings with the 55 grain soft point PMC ammo. I haven't tried anything else yet as the temperature here has been way too cold for me to get out and shoot just for the fun of it.
And to "bigkelly", thanks, that's what I needed to know. I've had several people including the rep at Savage tell me not to use steel shot or slugs. Others have said that didn't make sense to them, But I felt sure someone on here could tell me if they had used either safely or with no problems. The slug part made no sense to me, but I have heard that the steel shot does not compress like lead and may scratch the barrels in some older guns not designed for it, causing accuracy or patterning issues in later use. Nice to hear from someone with actual experience in theirs. That's what I was hoping for on the 223 question also. I'm sure there are people out there who have tried it and I'd like to hear from them.
|
|
|
Post by cas on Feb 2, 2013 17:40:23 GMT -5
It may not seem like a lot, but it's enough to blow primers out of cases. I used to work as an RO at a public range and I would see it fairly often actually. Guys would come asking for help, why their cases had no primer and were black? Always the same thing, 5.56 in a .223 chamber.
|
|
|
Post by vancmike on Feb 14, 2013 0:04:16 GMT -5
I'd be really surprised if Mdl 24 barrels have a 1-9" twist. Most 223 hunting/varmint rifles produced even today have a 1-12" twist, which is more effective with 35-45 gr. bullets.
Posts in the old forum have reports of 223 Rem in 1-14" twist, which were obviously barrels originally destined to be 222 Rem chambered, but then switched to 223.
In any case (and I'm ready to be surprised), let's have some reports on Mdl 223 twists. My 222 Rem is 1/14".
|
|
|
Post by oldfotoman on Feb 15, 2013 19:58:32 GMT -5
I think I'm going to have to agree with you guys on the twist rate for the mdl 24, since mine does not look to be that fast either.
I know the cartridge was originally designed fro a rate of 1:9,with the 55 gr. bullets, and changed to a rate of 1:7 for the 62 gr., but it certainly appears that many civilian guns chambered for the 223 used a rate of 1:12. The faster twist certainly stabilizes bullets better, but many reports show the 1:12 rate being effective up to the 55 gr. rounds.
As I stated earlier, I was simply stating what Savage told me, and the rates they claim in all of their literature and web sites for their guns, but they also said they had no data on the mdl 24. How they can produce a gun for 12 years (1995-2007 under this company ownership) and not have any data or records of them is beyond me, but that's what they say. I can understand them not having data or records on the ones produced before they took over the company, but not to keep data on what they produced ! They flatly state that all of their 223 barrels are either a 1:9 or a 1:7 twist rate for all of the models that they produce, and they produced the last 12 years production of the mdl. 24, so I assumed they knew what they were talking about.
After looking at mine, I tend to agree with most of you. It would be interesting to find out if they changed it in different years.
I kind of wonder why so many manufacturers made guns with a slower twist rate than the cartridge was originally designed for, but that's a question probably best left to the loading forums. Statistics seem to indicate that the faster twist rates not only stabilize heavier bullets better, but seem to provide a slightly flatter trajectory; and the flatter trajectory seems to be why many cartridges were designed to use the faster rates.
|
|
|
Post by cas on Feb 15, 2013 22:55:03 GMT -5
I know the cartridge was originally designed fro a rate of 1:9,with the 55 gr. bullets, and changed to a rate of 1:7 for the 62 gr…. That's the 5.56 I believe the original twist for the .223 was 1-12. Of course the "weight" of the bullet has nothing to do with it, it's length. First thing to do is make sure you're shooting a flat base bullet. Then try and avoid anything with a long nose/ogive. A VLD boat tail bullet is going to be a poor choice for 1-12.
|
|
|
Post by vancmike on Feb 28, 2013 13:23:11 GMT -5
cas: ".....the original twist for the .223 was 1-12....."
I believe that's correct; I've owned 4 rifles in .223 (Browning low wall, Browning x-bolt, Remington 700, Win Mdl 70) and all were 1-12 twist.
Since we can't hunt deer with any caliber under .24/6mm (I live in the upper left-hand corner of your map), it's never bothered me to not be able to shoot longer/heavier bullets; I've used them for varmints, etc.
In any case, oldfoto, I believe you've received the answer to your question: don't shoot 5.56 Nato ammo in your Sav 24!!!
|
|
|
Post by vancmike on Mar 12, 2013 16:44:56 GMT -5
|
|